The Liberal Media Strikes Again!
Dear Readers,
A big stink has been raised (predictably) by the west-coast, liberal elite, liberal media over the supposed statement of British PM Tony Blair, agreeing with a reporter's assessment that the War on Terror in Iraq has been "disastrous." As could be expected, the liberal media injected their liberal bias in order to make Blair look like a liberal who opposes the War. Blair himself has stated that this was taken out of context. I mean, who doesn't see the myriad of ways to interpret his agreement with the "disastrous" assessment? It could just as easily means he disagrees with it.
But the liberals, as mentioned, have jumped all over this. They see another opportunity to attack our divinely-inspired President. What they don't realize is that, although only 31% of Americans approve of how our President is performing his job, 100% of real Americans approve. And this distinction makes all of the difference.
Look, W and Blair both realize that we're involved in the most important conflict in the history of the world. They both see the need to continue to fight in Iraq despite the fact that the guy who attacked us is in Afghanistan. And they both recognize the necessity to keep fighting in spite of the NIE's report that all we're doing is creating more terrorists. Most importantly, they see the need for us to fight them there so we don't have to fight them here.
Tony Blair - who was only taken out of context - thank you for loving America!
-Theodore Trumblebunks, I, Esq.
A big stink has been raised (predictably) by the west-coast, liberal elite, liberal media over the supposed statement of British PM Tony Blair, agreeing with a reporter's assessment that the War on Terror in Iraq has been "disastrous." As could be expected, the liberal media injected their liberal bias in order to make Blair look like a liberal who opposes the War. Blair himself has stated that this was taken out of context. I mean, who doesn't see the myriad of ways to interpret his agreement with the "disastrous" assessment? It could just as easily means he disagrees with it.
But the liberals, as mentioned, have jumped all over this. They see another opportunity to attack our divinely-inspired President. What they don't realize is that, although only 31% of Americans approve of how our President is performing his job, 100% of real Americans approve. And this distinction makes all of the difference.
Look, W and Blair both realize that we're involved in the most important conflict in the history of the world. They both see the need to continue to fight in Iraq despite the fact that the guy who attacked us is in Afghanistan. And they both recognize the necessity to keep fighting in spite of the NIE's report that all we're doing is creating more terrorists. Most importantly, they see the need for us to fight them there so we don't have to fight them here.
Tony Blair - who was only taken out of context - thank you for loving America!
-Theodore Trumblebunks, I, Esq.
6 Comments:
Drum major, Rangel's at it again. What do you think?
Assuming the remote chance his bill gets passed, this will become the United States of Socialist Republic, a breeding ground for terrorists. What will this world come to?
Well, I'm torn. On the one hand, Rangel's another member of the west-coast, liberal elite. On the other hand, with more soldiers, think of all of the countries we could pre-emptively invade! We could dpread freedom at the end of an M-16 throughout the world (I'm looking at you, Canada)! So, on consideration, I support this bill!
-Theodore Trumblebunks, I, Esq.
To the second anonymous poster, how would a draft bill make a country a "breeding ground for terrorists"?
it creates hostility among young people--maybe creating terrorists is a step too big, but it will bring back the turbulent 1960s again. I am assuming anonymous 3 is a West-Coast liberal elite. Ted, Rangel is from Harlem, not the W. Coast. You support this bill? How dare you!
I support this bill because, with more troops, we can spread freedom to more places! It's quite simple, really.
-Theodore Trumblebunks, I, Esq.
Post a Comment
<< Home